Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
Telephone: (603) 893-0074
Fax: (603) 893-5022
info@byebyedwi.com
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals.


DWI CASE EXAMPLE 5:

CLIENT STOPPED FOR DRIVING 86 MILES PER HOUR & ADMITS TO DRINKING TWO MIXED COCKTAILS

Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire DWI case. It is by no means a guaranty of any particular result in any other case.

BASIC FACTS: A state trooper clocked the defendant on radar at 86 miles per hour in a 55 mile per hour zone in Interstate 93. The trooper began to pursue the defendant passed and stopped him on the side of the highway.

The defendant pulled the car over and the trooper’s questioning began. The trooper detected a very strong odor of alcohol coming from the defendant’s car. The defendant admitted drinking two mixed cocktails earlier in the night.

The trooper ordered the defendant out of his car to and then conducted a series of “field sobriety tests” on the defendant. The defendant allegedly “failed” a “horizontal gaze nystagmus” (“HGN”) test, a “walk and turn test” and a “one leg stand test”. The trooper testified that the defendant stepped off the line and failed to walk in heel-to-toe fashion during the walk-and-turn test. He also testified that the defendant put his foot down four times with each foot on the one leg stand test and could not hold his leg in the air for longer that a count of 4.

The defendant was arrested for driving while intoxicated (DWI). The defendant refused to submit to any breath test or blood test. He decided to fight the case.

DEFENSE: Actual innocence.

TRIAL RESULT: The state presented the testimony of the state trooper who the field sobriety tests. Attorney Stevens questioned the trooper about numerous “cues of impairment” that are typically found during field sobriety tests that were not present in this case. Additionally, Attorney Stevens pointed out the many normal, ordinary responses the defendant performed and said correctly during the roadside encounter with the trooper.

After trial, the defendant was found NOT GUILTY of this DWI charge. He left the courthouse with no DWI conviction on his record and drove home a free man!
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!




Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:


I will call you back at the earliest opportunity. Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice message or email. We will discuss that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.

Back to Top of This Page






Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.

Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2005, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.