|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
DWI CASE EXAMPLE:
Conduct After Accident with DWI Charge
Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire DWI case.
It is by no means a guaranty of any particular result in any other case.
BASIC FACTS: : Police respond to a call from a residential caller who reports a car ran over
his mail box and that the driver did not stop and report it. Police investigation leads them to
defendant’s home. They see the defendant’s garage door open and the defendant’s vehicle
inside that has damage consistent with the damage caused to the mailbox.
The police ask to speak to the defendant, who comes to the door. Police allege that the defendant was
extremely intoxicated. The police asked the defendant to submit to field sobriety tests. The defendant
refused to submit to any field sobriety tests. The defendant also refused to submit to breath or blood testing
because he told police he had been drinking.
The defendant was arrested for driving while intoxicated first offense and conduct after an accident.
DEFENSE: Time of operation and whether the defendant was impaired by alcohol
at the time of operation..
ALS HEARING RESULT: The state sought a 180 day administrative license suspension (ALS)
because the defendant had refused to submit to a breath test for a DWI offense. After a hearing
at the Department of Safety, the defendant’s breath test refusal suspension was rescinded (reversed),
because the state had failed to prove the element of “impairment by alcohol” at the time of operation.
The defendant’s right to drive was restored pending trial.
COURT RESULT: Because the state could not prove what the defendant’s condition was at the
time of operation, the DWI complaint and the conduct after accident complaint were both dismissed
by the Trial Court.
The defendant’s license was not suspended for a single day!
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this and all successful defenses!
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2005, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.