|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
WEEK OF FEBRUARY 6 2006
Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com
DRIVER STOPPED FOR SPEEDING. POLICE FIND HALF-EMPTY
BOTTLE OF SCOTCH. DRIVER ADMITS TO
DRINKING 3 OR 4 BEERS. DRIVER THEN
ALLEGEDLY FAILS 3 “FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS” AND THEN BLOWS .20 TWICE ON BREATH TEST
AT POLICE STATION
BASIC FACTS: Driver stopped for speeding on a state highway by local police officers. The officers clocked the driver at 60 mph in a 40 mph zone using their radar. The officers immediately noticed a half-empty bottle of scotch in the passenger area of the car and interrogated the defendant about drinking. The driver admitted to drinking three or four beers and asked the defendant to take “field sobriety tests”. The cooperative driver agreed to take the field sobriety tests. The officer testified that the driver was “unsteady on his feet” as he walked to the rear of the vehicle. The driver performed a typical battery of roadside gymnastics: a Romberg balance test, the “heel to toe test” and the “one-leg-stand test”. The driver predictably “failed” all the tests. The officer arrested the driver and charged him with DWI. This was a second offense, which exposed the driver to mandatory jail time and a 3 year loss of his right to drive if he lost at trial.
At the police station, the officer asks the driver if he would take a breath test. The driver agreed, because he did not feel drunk. The driver blew a .20 on two occasions. The driver was charged with DWI-second offense, aggravated DWI because he blew over a .16, and open container for the bottle of scotch.
TRIAL OUTCOME: The state would not agree to reduce the charge. Attorney Stevens challenged the breath test readings due to defects in the breath test records. The Trial Court excluded the test results because of those defects. The defendant was found “NOT GUILTY” of “DWI second offense” and “NOT GUILTY” OF “Aggravated DWI”. The only guilty verdict was for the open container of scotch. The driver paid a small fine; he did not go to jail and he did not lose his license. RESULT: NOT GUILTY VERDICT!!!
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this
successful defense!!!
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2006, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.