|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED CASE EXAMPLE
DWI/ALS Victory
June 14, 2011
DUI Case example: 180 Day suspension of right to drive based on an alleged “.11
Breath Test” result -DISMISSED after an administrative license suspension
hearing at
Please note-this is an example
of the result of a recent
BASIC FACTS: This citizen was stopped in the parking lot of a campground
after a police officer saw an expired registration on the citizen’s car. The officer approached the citizen smelled the
odor of alcohol and began peppering the driver with questions about drinking. After the initial interrogation, the officer
asked the driver to do a series of balancing acts called “field sobriety
tests”. These occur just before the
police arrest a driver for DWI. The
driver did the balancing tricks, and did fairly well on them, but got arrested
any way for DWI. The officer took the citizen back to the
police station, where he agreed to take a “breath test”. The alleged result of this test was a .11
breath alcohol concentration. The
officer then took this citizen’s driver’s license away and gave him a temporary
pink paper license. Even though this
citizen had a clean driving record, no prior DWI arrests, and fully cooperated
with the police, the state sought a 180 day administrative license suspension
for his alleged breath test result after a DWI arrest.
This driver called
HEARING PROCEDURE: Attorney
Stevens requested a hearing for this driver at the
After taking the case under advisement,
the Hearings Examiner dismissed the administrative license suspension and
dismissed the suspension action, because the state did not fulfill its
requirements to sustain the administrative license suspension. The citizen’s right to drive was restored.
RESULT: ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE
SUSPENSION DISMISSED!!! This citizen’s
right to drive was restored. He did not
suffer the 180 day license suspension that the state tried to inflict on him.
Attorney
Stevens thanks God for this successful defense:
TODAY’S SCRIPTURE:
Jesus Christ is the same, yesterday, today and forever.
Hebrews 13:8
WG CaDC ROHE
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2011, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.