|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
Driving While
Intoxicated Case Example
CASE VICTORY October
26, 2010
DWI ALS CASE EXAMPLE: 180 day suspension of right to drive based on an alleged
refusal to take a breath test-Dismissed after an administrative license
suspension hearing at the New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles (“DMV”)
Please
note-this is an example of the result of a recent
BASIC FACTS: The citizen
in this case was stopped for allegedly “swerving within his lane”, “crossing
the white fog line”, then “crossing the yellow double center line”, a common
trilogy of transgressions in police reports in DUI cases. He was stopped, interrogated about drinking
and asked to get out of his car. The
officer asked him to perform a series of sidewalk acrobatics known as “DWI
field sobriety tests”. He told him to
perform the “follow-the-pen test”, which police call the “horizontal gaze
nystagmus” or “HGN” test. He scored a six
out of six on the pen test. He then had the
driver do a “walk and turn test” and a “one leg stand test”. The driver allegedly “failed” these tests. The officer’s conclusion of course, after the
entire series of sidewalk acrobatics, was that the citizen was under the
influence of alcohol so the officer arrested him.
At the station he declined
to blow into the police breath testing hose.
The citizen later received a suspension action notice from the New
Hampshire DMV because he allegedly refused to submit to a “breath test” test
after being arrested for DWI. The notice
said that his driver’s license would be suspended for 180 days for the refusal.
This driver contacted Attorney
Mark Stevens at 1-603-893-0074 within the thirty day time period in which a
hearing can be requested to challenge this suspension. Attorney Stevens filed a hearing request with
the Department of Safety in
HEARING PROCEDURE: Attorney Stevens requested a
hearing for this citizen at the
The
issue in this case was whether the driver actually refused to blow into the
breath testing hose. The driver was
nearsighted and was reluctant to review the implied consent form with the
arresting officer. The officer lost
patience and decided the driver was out of time to make up his mind as to
whether to blow or not. After the hearing,
the hearings examiner rescinded the administrative license suspension in this
case.
RESULT: ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION
DISMISSED!!! This citizen’s right to
drive was restored. He did not suffer the
180 day administrative license suspension that the state sought to impose on him.
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful
defense!!!
TODAY’S SCRIPTURE:
“But they who wait for the Lord shall renew their strength;
they shall mount up with wings like eagles;
they shall run and not be weary;
they shall walk and not faint.
Isaiah
40:31
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2010, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.