|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
DRIVING WHILE
INTOXICATED CASE EXAMPLE
CASE VICTORY JULY 26, 2010
DWI ALS CASE EXAMPLE: 180 day suspension of right to drive based on an alleged
refusal to take a breath test-Dismissed after an administrative license
suspension hearing at the New Hampshire Division of Motor Vehicles (?DMV?)
Please
note-this is an example of the result of a recent
BASIC FACTS: The citizen
in this case was stopped for allegedly ?driving with his high beams on?. He was stopped, interrogated about drinking
and asked to get out of his car. The
officer asked him to perform the roadside gymnastics known as ?DWI field
sobriety tests?. He told him to perform
the ?magic pen test?, which police call the ?horizontal gaze nystagmus? or
?HGN? test. He scored a four out of six
on the pen test. He then had the driver
do a ?walk and turn test? and a ?one leg stand test?. The driver allegedly ?failed? these tests. The officer?s conclusion of course, after the
entire series of sidewalk acrobatics, was that the citizen was under the influence
and the officer arrested him.
At the station he declined
to blow into the police breath testing hose.
The citizen later received a suspension action notice from the New
Hampshire DMV because he allegedly refused to submit to a ?breath test? test
after being arrested for DWI. The notice
said that his driver?s license would be suspended for 180 days for the refusal.
This driver contacted Attorney
Mark Stevens at 1-603-893-0074 within the thirty day time period in which a
hearing can be requested to challenge this suspension. Attorney
Stevens filed a hearing request with the Department of Safety in
HEARING PROCEDURE: Attorney Stevens requested a
hearing for this citizen at the
The
issue in this case was whether there was even enough evidence to sustain an
administrative license suspension based on the officer?s conclusion that this
driver was impaired by anything. After
hearing the broth-like evidence of ?alleged impairment? presented by the state,
the hearings examiner rescinded the administrative license suspension in this
case.
RESULT: ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE
SUSPENSION DISMISSED!!! This citizen?s
right to drive was restored. He did not
suffer the 180 day administrative license suspension that the state sought to
impose on him.
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful
defense!!!
TODAY?S SCRIPTURE:
?And it is written, He scatters abroad. He gives to the poor; his deeds of justice
and goodness and kindness and benevolence will go on and endure forever!?
II Corinthians 9:9.
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2010, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.