DRIVING WHILE INTOXICATED CASE EXAMPLE

 CASE VICTORY FEBRUARY 16, 2010
DWI ALS CASE EXAMPLE: 2 YEAR SUSPENSION OF RIGHT TO DRIVE BASED ON AN ALLEGED REFUSAL OF A BREATH TEST-DISMISSED AFTER ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION HEARING AT THE DMV

http://www.ByeByeDWI.com

Please note-this is an example of the result of a recent New Hampshire DWI case. It is by no means a guarantee of any particular result in any other case.

http://www.byebyedwi.blogspot.com

BASIC FACTS: The citizen in this case was stopped for allegedly speeding.  He later received a suspension action notice from the New Hampshire DMV because he allegedly refused to submit to a breath test after being arrested for DWI  The notice said that his driver?s license would be suspended for 2 years because he had a prior chemical test refusal on his driving record.

This driver contacted Attorney Mark Stevens at 603-893-0074 within the thirty day time period in which a hearing can be requested to challenge this suspension.    Attorney Mark Stevens filed a hearing request with the Department of Safety in Concord to challenge the administrative license suspension action.

HEARING PROCEDURE:            Attorney Stevens requested a hearing for this citizen at the New Hampshire DMV Bureau of Hearings in Concord.  Attorney Stevens challenged everything in his hearing request that the law and the rules allow regarding alleged breath test refusals.  The rules that govern administrative license suspension hearings are found at New Hampshire Administrative Rule Saf-C 2800.  After the state presented its case Attorney Stevens cross examined the arresting officer.  In this case the officer refused to answer any questions about anything the driver did correctly.  He would answer every question that he did not like the answer to as follows: ?I do not recall?.  He did not recall a single thing the driver did correctly.  He also did not recall what the driver did incorrectly on the one field sobriety tests that he managed to conduct.  After answering ?I do not recall? to the point of absurdity, the hearing concluded

The issue in this case was whether there was even enough evidence to sustain an administrative license suspension.  After hearing the scant evidence presented by the state, the hearings examiner rescinded the administrative license suspension in this case.

RESULT:       ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION DISMISSED!!!   This citizen?s right to drive was restored immediately.  He did not suffer the 2 year administrative suspension that the state sought to impose on him.

Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!

TODAY?S SCRIPTURE:

?Thou shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor;?

Exodus 20:16 (the Eighth Commandment)

Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:

• Date of any alleged offense you have been charged with.
• The court in which you have been told to appear.
• The date and time you have been told to appear.
• Your telephone number and the best time to reach you.

Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.

Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2010, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.