|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION (?ALS?)
For ?Boating While Intoxicated? Case
BWI CASE VICTORY
AUGUST 3, 2009
DWI ALS CASE EXAMPLE: 2 YEAR SUSPENSION OF RIGHT TO DRIVE BASED ON AN ALLEGED .REFUSAL
TO SUBMIT TO A BREATH TEST-DISMISSED AFTER ADMINISTRATIVE LICENSE SUSPENSION
HEARING
Please note-this is an example
of the disposition of a recent
http://www.byebyedwi.blogspot.com
?OK, I need to do one more thing to see if you are OK to drive. Hold
your hands out. When I say ?go?, touch
the tip of your thumb to the tip of your index finger and say ?one?, then
quickly touch the tip of your thumb to the tip of your middle finger and say
?two?, then quickly touch the tip of your thumb to the tip of your ring finger
and say ?three?, then quickly touch the tip of your pinkie and say ?four?, then
quickly touch the tip of your pinkie again and say ?one?, then quickly touch
the tip of your ring finger again and say ?two?, then quickly touch the tip of
your middle finger again and say ?three?, then touch the tip of your thumb to
the tip of your index finger again and say ?four?.
Imagine the
registry employee then tells you, ?Now
you just keep doing what I just explained again and again until I tell you to stop,
keep going faster and faster and faster until you make a mistake.?
First of all,
you might well ask, ?What does this have
to do with how well I can drive??
The answer the DMV employee gives you is, ?well this is a divided attention test, much like when you are driving?. Would you buy that? Of course not, because it
makes no logical sense.
Secondly, you
might want to know how and whether you pass or fail. Imagine the registry employee tell you, ?Oh, well there really is no scoring
system. It?s entirely up to my own
subjective opinion whether I give you a license after I watch you do all this
stuff. ?
Would you say,
?Hey sure, that sounds ok to me, more than fair and completely relevant. I?ll leave it entirely up to your subjective
opinion whether I get my license, or keep it or lose it, based on how you think
I do with that finger counting exercise you just described!?
Of course you
wouldn?t. But that is one of the things
you?ll be asked to do if you elect to run the gauntlet of ?marine field sobriety
tests? if the officer smells alcohol.
CHOOSE WHETHER TO DO THESE CARFEULLY.
Now on to the
facts of this case?.
BASIC
FACTS: The driver of a boat in this case was stopped for having a ?light
out?, the usual precursor to a ?boating while intoxicated? arrest. An officer activated the blue light on his
patrol boat and stopped the driver. Once
stopped, the patrolman marched the driver through a gauntlet of ?safety inspection?
questions and exercises, demanding to see lifejackets and flotation
devices. Even though these tasks were
performed flawlessly, the patrolman interrogated him about drinking. The officer reported that the driver?s eyes
were ?bloodshot and glassy?, stock observations that appear in nearly every DWI
or BWI report.
The officer then ordered the driver to
board the patrol boat for some ?marine field sobriety testing?. (NOTE FOR THE UNWARY: THIS IS THE POINT AT
WHICH THE ARREST DECISION HAS PROBABLY ALREADY BEEN MADE. CHOOSE WHETHER TO PERFORM THESE ?TESTS?
CAREFULLY. THERE IS NO SCORING SYSTEM
FOR THESE EXERCISES, AND THE DECISION TO ARREST IS ENTIRELY BASED UPON THE OFFICER?S
WHIM). Marine field sobriety tests are
an unusual battery of seated dexterity exercises designed to trick the
driver. These are the seafaring version
of the sidewalk acrobatics known as ?standardized field sobriety testing? done
during DWI cases at the roadside. The
most basic difference is that there is NO OBJECTIVE SCORING CRITERIA FOR MARINE
FIELD SOBRIETY TESTING.
In this case
the driver supposedly failed the ?pen test?, also known as the ?Horizontal Gaze
Nystagmus? test, which is when the officer waives his pen in front of the
driver?s face and decides the driver is impaired by alcohol. While he allegedly
?failed? the sideways pen test, he ?passed? the pen test that the officer did
by waiving the pen up and down.
The driver
went on to fail the ?finger count test?
The ?finger count test? is like a parlor trick in which the driver has
to touch the tips of his fingers while counting out loud, faster and faster
until he makes a few mistakes, at which point the officer moves along to the
next ?test?. After the finger counting
was a ?palm pat test?, another weird exercise in which the driver flips his
palm over and back while counting rapidly until he makes a mistake and ?fails?
that too. The driver also performed a
?finger to nose test?, an old law enforcement favorite.
He was asked
to ?say the alphabet without singing it?.
The driver said the entire alphabet, without missing any letters or
mixing any letters up, but he said the letters ?slowly? (as in not singing
them?). The officer also directed the
driver to ?count backwards? from 25 to 1.
The driver did that test perfectly, but he also counted backwards
?slowly?. Despite counting backwards
perfectly, the officer arrested the driver anyway.
Back at the
station this citizen chose not to blow into the breath testing hose when asked
to do so by the officer. The boat
operator hired Attorney Stevens to fight the administrative license suspension
attached to his Boating While Intoxicated (?BWI?) charge.
HEARING
PROCEDURE: Attorney Stevens requested a hearing on the driver?s behalf at
the Department of Safety. Attorney
Stevens challenged everything in his hearing request that the law and the rules
allow regarding boating while intoxicated license suspensions Attorney Stevens
moved to dismiss this administrative license suspension action against this
citizen based on a statutory and regulatory argument that the administrative
license suspension action could not stand.
The driver?s administrative license suspension was dismissed after the
hearing.
RESULT: ADMINISTRATIVE
LICENSE SUSPENSION DISMISSED!!! The citizen?s
right to drive was restored immediately.
He did not suffer the 2 year administrative suspension that the state
sought to impose on him.
Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful
defense!!!
TODAY?S SCRIPTURE:
?For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has freed me from the
law of sin and death.
For God has done what the Law could not do, it being
weakened by the flesh. Sending His own
Son in the guise of sinful flesh and as an offering for sin. God condemned sin in the flesh .?
Romans 8: 2-3.
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2009, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.