The driver hired Attorney Stevens to challenge the charge.

DEFENSE:     Attorney Stevens filed a motion to suppress all evidence of the running of the defendant’s plate, which he argued was illegal under New Hampshire’s “highway surveillance” statute.  The Court agreed, and suppressed all evidence against the defendant.  The trial court DISMISSED the complaint against the defendant that alleged she had operated after suspension.

RESULT:       MOTION TO SUPPRESS GRANTED.  CASE DISMISSED!!!

Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!

“The LORD is my light and my salvation; who shall I fear?

The LORD is the defense of my life; Whom shall I dread?”  PSALM 27:1.

New Hampshire Revised Statute Annotated RSA 236:130

236:130  Highway Surveillance Prohibited.

  I. In this subdivision, "surveillance" means the act of determining the ownership of a motor vehicle or the identity of a motor vehicle's occupants on the public ways of the state or its political subdivisions through the use of a camera or other imaging device or any other device, including but not limited to a transponder, cellular telephone, global positioning satellite, or radio frequency identification device, that by itself or in conjunction with other devices or information can be used to determine the ownership of a motor vehicle or the identity of a motor vehicle's occupants.

II. Neither the state of New Hampshire nor its political subdivisions shall engage in surveillance on any public ways of the state or its political subdivisions.

III. The prohibition set forth in paragraph II shall not apply where surveillance:

   (a) Is specifically authorized by statute;

   (b) Is undertaken on a case-by-case basis in the investigation of a particular violation, misdemeanor, or felony;

   (c) Is undertaken to produce images or data that:

      (1) Are viewed only at the transportation management center of the department of transportation in connection with a particular incident occurring on a public way; and

      (2) Are not recorded;

   (d) Is incidental to the monitoring of a building or other structure under the control of the state or a political subdivision of the state; or

   (e) Is undertaken for the security of the following bridges and approach structures: I-95 Piscataqua River Bridge, Sarah Mildred Long Bridge, and the Memorial Bridge, all in Portsmouth.

IV. Nothing in this section shall prevent the creation, transmission, or recording of any images or data which cannot, by enhancement, manipulation, or otherwise, be used for surveillance.

V. Any person violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a violation if a natural person, or guilty of a misdemeanor if any other person.

HISTORY: 2006, 107:1, eff. July 1, 2006.

Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:

• Date of any alleged offense you have been charged with.
• The court in which you have been told to appear.
• The date and time you have been told to appear.

Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.