|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
DWI CASE EXAMPLE:
CLIENT CHARGED WITH DWI
DWI CASE EXAMPLE: DRIVER STOPPED AFTER POLICE OFFICER CLOCKS DRIVER ON
RADAR DRIVING BETWEEN 27 AND 31 IN A 30 MPH ZONE. THE DRIVER THEN ALLEGEDLY
“FAILED” THREE FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS, AND BLEW A .10 IN THE BREATH TESTING
GADGET AT THE POLICE STATION.
DOES
IT SOUND LIKE THE POLICE HAD NO GOOD REASON TO STOP
THIS DRIVER? READ ON TO SEE WHAT THE TRIAL COURT THOUGHT…
MOTION TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE GRANTED-DWI CHARGE DISMISSED
WEEK OF
Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com
Please note-this is an example of
the disposition of a recent
The officer claimed the driver’s speech was slurred and activated the blue lights on the cruiser. The police officer then marched the driver through the usual goulash of sidewalk gymnastics called “field sobriety tests”. The driver allegedly failed a pen test (police call these a horizontal gaze nystagmus, or “HGN” tests), a “nine step walk and turn test”, and a “one leg stand test”. The driver admitted drinking “a few beers” shortly prior to driving. After the battery of the balancing and pen-following exercises, the officer arrested the driver and charged him with DWI. The driver decided to risk blowing into the breath testing gadget at the police station. He blew a .10.
After his arrest, the defendant hired Attorney Stevens to fight the DWI charge.
DEFENSE: Because the officer had no real legal reason to stop the driver, Attorney Stevens filed a motion to suppress (throw out or exclude) all the evidence that followed the illegal stopping of the driver’s car. After a hearing, the Court agreed with Attorney Stevens that there was no legal reason to stop the driver’s car, and excluded all the evidence in the case. The driver’s DWI case was dismissed!
RESULT: DWI CASE DISMISSED!!!
Attorney
Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2007, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.