Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
Telephone: (603) 893-0074
Fax: (603) 893-5022
info@byebyedwi.com
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals.

DWI CASE EXAMPLE: JULY 2, 2007

CLIENT CHARGED WITH DWI  

DWI CASE EXAMPLE: DRIVER STOPPED AFTER FAILING TO USE DIRECTIONAL TWICE.  THE DRIVER THEN ALLEGEDLY “FAILED” FOUR FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS, REFUSED THE BATTERY OPERATED ROADSIDE BREATH TEST, AND REFUSED A BLOOD TEST

NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL ON DWI CHARGE-CASE RESULT

JULY 2, 2007

Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com

Please note-this is an example of the disposition of a recent New Hampshire DWI case. It is by no means a guarantee of any particular result in any other case.

BASIC FACTS: A police officer saw the defendant drive down an off-ramp off an interstate highway.  Although the driver stopped normally, he failed to use his turn signal which caused the police officer to follow him.  The driver made another turn without using a turn signal.  The driver had his lights on and his speed was normal.  The driver made another turn, then began to back up to reverse direction.  The officer then activated his blue lights and stopped the driver.  The police directed the driver through a medley of sidewalk gymnastics called “field sobriety tests”.  The driver allegedly failed a pen test (police call these a horizontal gaze nystagmus, or the “HGN” test), a “nine step walk and turn test”, a “one leg stand test”, and a “Romberg Balance Test”. The officer smelled alcohol on the driver’s breath.

            After the battery of the balancing tests, the officer asked the driver to submit to a hand-held, battery operated breath testing device.  The driver elected not to put the fate of his driving license into the battery-operated gadget.  The officer then told him he would be placed under arrest for DWI.  They arrested the driver and charged him with DWI any way.  He declined a blood test when the police tried to get him take one.

            After his arrest, the defendant hired Attorney Stevens to fight the DWI charge.

DEFENSE:     Reasonable doubt.  The case went to trial.  At trial, the state presented the testimony of the arresting officer.  Attorney Stevens presented the testimony of the passenger in the defendant’s car.  Through questioning the officer, Attorney Stevens raised doubts about the defendant’s intoxication, including many aspects of the roadside gymnastics that the defendant performed quite well on.  At the close of the evidence, the defendant was found NOT GUILTY of DWI.       

RESULT:       NOT GUILTY!!!

Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!





Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:


I will call you back at the earliest opportunity. Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice message or email. We will discuss that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.

Back to Top of This Page






Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.

Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2007, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.