Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway
Salem, NH 03079
Telephone: (603) 893-0074
Fax: (603) 893-5022
info@byebyedwi.com
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals.


DWI CASE OF THE WEEK: MAY 18, 2007

DWI -SECOND OFFENSE CHARGE

DWI CASE EXAMPLE: DRIVER STOPPED FOR HAVING A PLATE LIGHT OUT, THEN ALLEGEDLY “FAILS” FOUR FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS AND REFUSES THE BATTERY OPERATED ROADSIDE BREATH TEST, THEN REFUSES THE BREATH TEST AT THE POLICE STATION

NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL ON DWI SECONF OFFENSE CHARGE-

WEEK OF MAY 18, 2007

BASIC FACTS: The defendant was stopped by a police officer for having a plate light out.  He was not driving improperly in any way.  The officer activated his blue lights and stopped the defendant.  The police directed the defendant through the medley of sidewalk gymnastics called “field sobriety tests”.  The defendant allegedly failed a pen test (police call these a horizontal gaze nystagmus, or “HGN” test, a “walk and turn test”, a “one leg stand test, and a “finger to nose test”.  The defendant denied any consumption of alcohol.  After the battery of the balancing tests, the officer asked the defendant to submit to a hand-held, battery operated breath testing device.  The defendant elected not to put his fate into the device and declined to do the roadside breath test.

The officer then arrested the defendant and put him in his patrol car.  At the police station the defendant refused to take a breath test.  He hired Attorney Stevens to fight the DWI charge.

DEFENSE:     Reasonable doubt.  The case went to trial.  The defendant faced a 3 year loss of license and up to a year in jail if convicted.  At trial, the state presented the testimony of the arresting officer.  Through cross examination of the officer, Attorney Stevens raised doubts about the defendant’s intoxication.  At the close of the evidence, the defendant was found NOT GUILTY of DWI.       

RESULT:       NOT GUILTY!!!

Attorney Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!





Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email, please include ONLY the following information:


I will call you back at the earliest opportunity. Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice message or email. We will discuss that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.

Back to Top of This Page






Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice and does not constitute an engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated with the Mark Stevens Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general nature and may not apply to any particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that laws change frequently. We will make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but are under no obligation to do so. No part of this document, nor any information contained in this website, may be disseminated without this paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.

Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2006, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.