|
Law Office of Mark Stevens
5 Manor Parkway Salem, NH 03079 Telephone: (603) 893-0074 Fax: (603) 893-5022 info@byebyedwi.com |
Admitted in all state and federal courts in New Hampshire and Massachusetts. Representing clients in criminal defense matters, including narcotics charges, drunk driving charges, Driving While Intoxicated (DWI), Operating Under the Influence (OUI), and Driving Under the Influence (DUI). Representation of clients at Department of Motor Vehicles (NH) and Registry of Motor Vehicles (MA) hearings and appeals. |
CASE OF THE DAY: FEBRUARY 7, 2007
DWI -FIRST OFFENSE CHARGE
DWI CASE EXAMPLE: DRIVER INVOLVED IN ROLLOVER ACCIDENT, THEN ALLEGEDLY
“FAILS” THREE FIELD SOBRIETY TESTS AND REFUSES A BREATH TEST AT THE POLICE
STATION
NOT GUILTY AFTER TRIAL ON DWI CHARGE-FEBRUARY 7, 2007
Sponsored by ByeByeDWI.com
Please note-this is an example of
the disposition of a recent
BASIC FACTS: The defendant was involved in a single car accident. She ran off the road and rolled her car over. Police and EMTs arrived at the scene and began treating her (the EMTs) and interrogating her (the police). The police directed the defendant through the usual medley of sidewalk gymnastics called “field sobriety tests”. The defendant allegedly “failed” a horizontal gaze nystagmus (“HGN”) test, a “walk and turn test”, and a “one leg stand test. The officer asked the defendant how intoxicated she felt on a scale of 0 to 10 and she answered that she was “a 2”. When questioned as to whether she felt “buzzed”, she said “yes”. The defendant told the officer that she had 2 glasses of wine with dinner.
After the battery of field sobriety maneuvers and interrogation, the officer arrested the defendant for DWI and put her in his patrol car. At the police station the defendant refused to take a breath test. She hired Attorney Stevens to fight the DWI charge.
DEFENSE: Actual innocence. Attorney Stevens consulted with an expert collision analysis expert, William Closs, and an expert in pharmacokinetics, Jay Godfrey of CG Labs. After carefully reviewing all the pertinent facts the accident was not the defendant’s fault at all, and she was not intoxicated either. The case went to trial. At trial, the state presented the testimony of two police officers who testified that the defendant was impaired by alcohol, that she smelled like alcohol, that her eyes were red, and the usual goulash of observations in a DWI case. At the close of the evidence, the defendant was found NOT GUILTY of DWI. Because this defendant actually won her administrative license suspension proceedings, she did not suffer ANY license loss, which was a just result because she was not impaired.
RESULT: NOT GUILTY!!!
Attorney
Stevens thanks God for this successful defense!!!
Contact Information:
If you leave a voice message or send an email,
please include ONLY the following information:
I will call you back at the earliest opportunity.
Do NOT include any specifics about your case in a recorded voice
message or email. We will discuss
that on the phone, and in greater detail in person.
Back to Top of This Page
Information in this column should not be construed as legal advice
and does not constitute an
engagement of the Mark Stevens Law Office, nor any attorney associated
with the Mark Stevens
Law Office. The information contained herein is of a general
nature and may not apply to any
particular set of facts and circumstances. Please bear in mind that
laws change frequently. We will
make an effort to update the information on a regular basis, but
are under no obligation to do so. No
part of this document, nor any information contained in this website,
may be disseminated without this
paragraph. This may be considered legal advertising.
Original Web Page Development by Randy Bone.
Copyright 2006, Attorney Mark Stevens, All rights reserved.
All brand or product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies or organizations.